![]() Understood like this, the urban becomes a concrete utopia-a possibility, a promise to be constantly produced and reproduced. Right to participation they represent encounters that emerge in constant struggle, contestation and negotiation processes. ![]() Terminology we, hence, argue that these practices reflect the right to centrality Yet, our findings also reveal that such practices bring to light important elements of the right to the city, especially claims for being within the urban core and democratic engagement in city-building. ![]() which, at times, resonate with neoliberal individualism. Co-productive practices might certainly entail a risk of underestimating broader structural changes in urban development In this chapter, reflections on encounters allow shedding light on emerging struggles but also negotiation practices between different actors in the co-production Of collaboration and knowledge exchange via ‘encounters’. , while at the same time engaged in networks Emphasis is placed on how civil society actors are locally connected to their cities-in our case mainly Berlin We argue not only for different avenues to understand the right to the city, but also emphasise that there is a need to reflect on how the concept has been reformulated by different local interactions. Reflecting on empirical material from Chile and Germany, this chapter combines practical insights for an analysis of co-productive urban projects with the aim to generate insights for the ‘right to the city’, a concept that has travelled from Europe
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |